The Case For Contraction
Contraction. For any sports fan, it’s an ugly word. Contraction means wiping a franchise from the face of the Earth. Contraction means uprooting an entire base and leaving them to search the sports landscape like nomads, looking for another team to latch on to.
About ten years ago, Major League Baseball began toying with the idea of contracting the Minnesota Twins and Montreal Expos. Neither team was pulling in good attendance numbers. Both teams were mostly floundering around their own divisions. Although Minnesota had taken two of five World Series’ (1987 and 1991), they were averaging less than 1.5M fans yearly after the players’ strike ended the 1994 season two months early. Montreal was crushed by the strike; they were poised to make their first playoff appearance since 1981 when the season was halted. The franchise never recovered.
For a couple of years, the few remaining faithful fans of the Twins and Expos were on the edge of their seats, waiting by their morning newspaper to hear if their franchises would be eradicated with one signature of a pen. Minnesota escaped relatively unscathed and returned to a respectable level of competition. Montreal wasn’t so lucky. The franchise was purchased by Major League Baseball and forced to play out lame duck seasons in Quebec until they were finally sold and moved to Washington to become today’s Washington Nationals.
In 2009, Major League Baseball is in a much better place. Revenues are at an all time high, the television contracts have been locked up long term and for billions of dollars. And although a cloud of performance enhancing drugs still hangs over the game like a dense mist, fans have responded with a resounding “We don’t care” at every turn and every hand-wringing BBWAA Hall-of-Fame voter pushing a new agenda. So at a time like this, who would ever talk about something as dirty as contraction?
Well… I was bored while I waited for the hammer to fall. So I started doing a little digging, and commissioned my own research study to determine whether or not contraction of MLB teams was still a viable option. What I found was actually pretty surprising.
Let’s start with the “why”. I am a fan of baseball first and foremost. While my loyalties lie with a big-market team (Boston), I am not immune to having a soft spot in my heart for small market franchises like Atlanta, Milwaukee, Kansas City and others. Without the small market teams, the entire economy of baseball would fall apart.
That doesn’t mean the system is perfect. Salaries and team payrolls are out of control in some locker rooms while other owners barely even spend the money they get in revenue sharing in order to line their pockets with as much extra as possible.
More importantly, when spring training breaks there are usually no more than a handful of teams with a legitimate shot at winning the World Series. Red Sox, Yankees, Mets, Cubs, Dodgers, Angels, Phillies, Indians, Tigers, Cardinals. Those are the current “haves” – the franchises with good enough teams coming out of spring training as well as the means to add the necessary pieces through trades or free agency to patch any hole that might pop-up mid-season. And, aside from the random Florida Marlins’ or Colorado Rockies’ sighting, at least one of those ten teams has been involved in every World Series since Major League Baseball settled their last labor dispute early in the 1995 regular season.
I don’t know about you, but I like having a little surprise in my life. Even though “my team” is one of those that supposedly always has a shot, I’d be happy to watch a team like the Brewers, Marlins, Royals or any of the other 20 teams in Major League Baseball make a miracle run to a championship.
There are only two real solutions to the problem: A salary cap / salary floor system where all teams will be forced to spend a minimum and penalized much more severely than they currently are for violating the maximum. In 2008, there was a $188M gap between the team spending the most money (Yankees, duh, at $209M) and the least (Marlins at just over $21M). In fact, there was a $72M gap between the Yankees and just the second place team in spending, the Mets. For the record, Boston was fourth at a little over $133M. I don’t play favorites – every team spending that much or that little is a disgrace.
The other option is everyone’s least favorite word, contraction. Pretend for a moment that you have no loyalty to any particular team, just the game of baseball in general. Wouldn’t it make sense to have four or six fewer teams, to raise the level of competition by lessening the overall number of players? Wouldn’t it be better for the baseball economy if there were fewer teams fighting over the same players, thereby lowering demand and leading to fewer situations where one player can hold an entire organization hostage while trying to get every last dollar out of another?
While I am fully in favor of the salary cap / floor proposition, Sparty has already given us the numbers on parity in the major sports since 1980. So let’s remove that as an option and instead explore the contraction question.
I set up four qualifications to “save” a team from the contraction axe based on statistics from 1995 (the year after the strike) to 2008. The categories were all based on averages of the 14 year period (11 for Tampa and Arizona), and were chosen to represent some of the more important measuring sticks of a Major League Franchise. (Click images to enlarge graphs)
Overall Regular Season Record – teams falling behind the median winning percentage over the span of fourteen years (a surprisingly low 0.495) were on the chopping block. Tampa Bay and Arizona had a bit of a disadvantage here, being expansions teams that, one would think, started out slowly in the early days of their franchises. However, Arizona has a respectable .504 winning percentage since the inception of the team, high enough to be spared.
Salaries – Teams who aren’t even bothering to spend on their product (at least over the median of the average salaries for all teams since 1994 – $60,601,545 per year) are up for the guillotine. Unfortunately, this statistic was the most skewed by the new economics of baseball over the past eight years when the $100M barrier was broken, then left in the dust. Marlins, Nationals, Twins, Royals and Rays – just five teams that have almost never even approached that “average”, let alone consistently broken it.
Attendance – If the fans aren’t showing up, then they’ve turned their backs. Some fans (Kansas City, Pittsburgh, and Montreal/Washington) can be given a little bit of a pass considering how terrible their teams have been for the past 14 years, but taking an objective look, no franchise could be spared. The average attendance was 2,546,810 per team since 1994. For comparison, the Nationals, Pirates, Reds, Marlins and Royals have broken that “average” number three times in fourteen years. Total. For all five franchises combined.
Franchise Success – If the team has won a pennant and appeared in a World Series since 1995, they’re safe. Barely. Seventeen of the thirty MLB franchises were saved in this way, and for five teams, this was the only think that saved them.
So, what did I come up with? A whopping seven franchises failed all four tests, and another seven were barely spared with a World Series appearance, futile spending or just plain old dumb luck.
Some of the teams that might be directly in the line of fire were obvious – Washington, Pittsburgh, Kansas City. Others were a little more surprising – Toronto, Cincinnati, Milwaukee and yes, even Minnesota. Maybe the Twins didn’t make it out unscathed.
The seven teams that were only barely saved were Oakland (good enough overall winning percentage at .538), Texas (they keep spending, just not winning), Tampa Bay, Detroit, Philadelphia, Florida, San Diego; they all failed every numbers test, but they each made a World Series run since 1995 and combined have won three titles including the Phillies last year when they beat Tampa Bay.
Let’s go one step further. Let’s assume that any of these fourteen cities would throw a complete shit fit if Major League Baseball suddenly announced that their teams were being contracted following the 2009 season. Kind of goes without saying. Now, let’s assume that any team that has built a new stadium in the past ten seasons would go completely over the edge, bringing in the lawyers and filing suit to keep their team because of city bonds, leases, etc. Again, just speaking in generalities here. But let’s say that any team that has opened a new ballpark since Opening Day 1999 is exempt from this study.
Thanks to Wikipedia, we find that thirteen MLB teams have opened the doors to a new ballpark since 1999, starting with the Mariners at Safeco Field ten years ago and continuing up to the much ballyhooed celebrations at Citi Field and New Yankee Stadium this season.
And, using that list, we can see that of our 14 teams potentially on the chopping block, seven (Washington, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Detroit, San Diego and Philadelphia) have all opened new parks since 1999. Minnesota and Florida (to be renamed the “Miami Marlins”) are in the process of building their own new stadiums to be opened in the next five years.
So, we’re down to five potential candidates. Kansas City, Toronto, Texas, Tampa Bay, Oakland. Yikes – there goes 1/3 of the American League.
So, after this entire exercise, it looks even less likely that something like this would ever happen. But, just for the hell of it, let’s take the final step and look at the realignment of the divisions. We’ll save the allotment of players in what would immediately be the best supplemental draft in baseball history for discussion in the comments.
With five teams being cut, the leagues would be uneven. As MLB is currently setup, there are 16 National League teams and 14 American League (Thanks Bud… way to help the Brewers out back in ’95.) If we cut five teams out, we’d be down to twenty-five total teams, and still have an un-even setup. So, let’s make the numbers work a little more effectively, and drop one more team from the ranks to give us six solid divisions and keep the playoff structure that has worked so well in the past fifteen seasons.
From our original list of 14 possible teams to be cut, the one falling below the threshold with the oldest (in relative terms of speaking) ballpark is… the Milwaukee Brewers. Oh the irony…
The AL East & West would each lose two teams, as well as one from both Central divisions. The remaining teams would have to be reshuffled into six four-team divisions, perhaps along these lines. The unbalanced schedule would be a thing of the past, allowing for teams to truly be tested against the rest of the league and not just against their own division for ½ of their yearly games. Maybe we’d see the end of Interleague Play, maybe not.
We’ve finally determined our teams to be cut. We have former World Series champions, our only international franchise, and a perennial loser that just recently started to turn things around. In one fell swoop, the entire balance of power could be shifted in Major League Baseball. Parity could be reinstated across the baseball landscape in an instant.
Now, the million (or even billion) dollar question. Who ya got?
If every team were allowed to draft from the Major League rosters of the contracted teams, think of the changes… Zach Grienke… Ryan Braun… Roy Halladay… BJ Upton… there’s almost an entire All-Star team just on these six franchises. The Supplemental Draft would be Must-See TV.
I’ll leave the draft up to you guys. If you have the #1 overall pick in the supplemental draft, who are you taking off of these six rosters? Personally, I’d go with Halladay, Braun or Carl Crawford. But I’ll leave it to you. Have at it.
Lata.
Popularity: 6% [?]
Longoria?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
you can’t switch the pirates to the AL. they have over 100 years in the NL
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
great piece Big D. If it was to come to this, I would most likely be taking Longoria.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I like the idea of contraction as a theory. I’m just not sure that you could ax teams like Oakland or Texas. Oakland’s winning percentage alone should be able to keep their franchise alive, and Texas can’t go away just because they’ve had a bad decade or so. They were trying to win and all. Let’s also not forget that the Rays are just starting to come together as a team and have a plan for what would be the coolest stadium on the frickin earth.
(http://www.mopupduty.com/raysproposed.jpg)
KC and Toronto though? It might be time for them to go. To correct that problem all you’d have to do is take the Brewers back to the AL Central and restore the Tigers to the AL EAST and everything would be fine.
That, by the way, was my only real complaint about your new contracted divisions. The Tigers should go back to the AL East. I also think that people might be upset about the splitting of the Philly/NY rivalry. You just as easily move the Nats and nobody cares.
All that said, the 1st pick is CLEARLY Ryan Braun. It’s not even close.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Wow, I forgot Longoria. It’s still Braun, but closer now with a very happy team picking #2.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
i say you contract any team that last won a world series over 100 years ago…
screw contracting milwaukee, the biggest turn around happened when we finally got the seligs out of ownership. now we need him out of the commissioner’s office so he stops using our park for snowouts for other teams
and you can’t contract them because they provide players to the rest of the league (McClouth, Aramis, etc)
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
…and that’s why you’re not a MLB GM.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
or better yet, contract the yankees. that’ll straighten out the payroll imbalance pretty quickly
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Less teams means less dilution of talent. It just means that less people over the country will be able to attend baseball games. If you contract a team in Minnesota for example, then there are plenty of kids who will never grow up following baseball in the greater Minneapolis region.
I have always supported a minimum salary requirement for teams. If they can’t make a profit paying the minimum salary, then the team should be moved or contracted. Also I agree with either a hard cap or higher luxury tax.
Still, the Rays beat the Yanks and Red Sox out last year so spending the money is no guarantee.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Brilliant!
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I was all set to blast this post…then The Rays drew 19,000 for a World series rematch…
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
The only reasons for Braun not being the #1 pick is that Longoria is two years younger and faces AL pitching already. Braun is clearly the better player right now.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
you mean all those kids who have parents that don’t take them to the game? and this was before the economy tanked.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
or combine teams that are in the same town or close
New York Yank-ets
Los Angeles Angers
Chicago Cox
Florida Marlays
Baltimore Orators
Pennsylvania Pilates
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Ya..but Longoria will be the better in the long run.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
and Longoria can man 3rd base. finding a young stud 3rd baseman is much more difficult than a corner outfielder.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I am not really a fan of regular season baseball, but I enjoyed this post. Well done, Big D!
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Clearly you’re wrong.
Longoria: 16 HR, 61 RBI, .304 BA, .397 OBP, .972 OPS
Braun: 15 HR, 50 RBI, .320 BA, .411 OBP, .984 OPS
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Trey-
I don’t know about that. Braun OPS’d 1000 at age 23.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Not to mention that Longoria is a very good defensive third basemen while Braun often looks lost in left
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Going back to my rant yesterday, I think the oppressive heat in Florida hurts baseball attendance. I know what you are going to say, the Rays play indoors. My answer to that is: Baseball indoors is not baseball, it is jai alai. Outdoor stadiums in moderate climates are more conducive to better attendance.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Longoria is a decent third baseman, but I wonder how long he stays there. Like almost all 3rd baseman, he may move to 1st in the next 5 years.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Contract the Nubs.
Transformers 2 was good, 30 minutes too long, but good.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
so, Longoria is more valuable now and in the future.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
sparty-
How did you even get that from what I said?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Gold Glove calibur is decent?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
That lineup witha 50 HR hitter provided him with a lot more protection than Longoria has now.
Even without it, Longoria is teetering on a 1000 OPS
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
cbh49er-
Did they have the teaser trailer for The Last Airbender in your theater? If so, how was?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
comment of the day! The Chicago Cox makes me giggle.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
john-
I use actual defense as a barometer for defense, not gold gloves.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Jeter wins gold gloves.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
i don’t agree with contraction, shocker.
i have no problem letting a team die. go bankrupt, lose all their assets, and become unable to run their business. i do not think it is MLBs decision to the cut them. their business folds, then they go. just like i don’t think MLB should help fund a team that is doing poorly financially. wow, this could turn political.
why is Darwinism not allowed in business?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
KWSN clearly has by back.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
longoria is a good 3b. braun was atrocious. gitc, i know there is another reason that you are fond of Braun.
/HeBrew’d
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
What?!
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I agree with Sparty on fiscal matters. It’s those pesky social issues that make me lean to the left.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
trey- he means guys like Mike Schmidt, Wade Boggs, George Brett, George Kell, Eddie Matthews, and Brooks Robinson.
A-Rod is on year 5 of playing 3rd, so he should be playing 1st next year.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
He’s not Steve Garvey…
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Yes they did, but to be honest with you I can’t even remember what it was about. I’m pretty tired. Didn’t get to bed until 330 AM.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I hope the Mets have someone to replace David Wright, when they have to move him to first next season.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Sparty-
I could pick a group of guys by statement applied to as well. It’s not hard.
And my liking of Braun isn’t Jew related because he isn’t actually Jewish.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
cbh49er-
I’m not typically an M. Night Shamalan guy, but the Airbender movies should be freaking awesome.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
yeah, he only really uses it when it’s convenient
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Don’t tell Shanoff that, or you will break his heart.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Me or Braun? I’m not sure Braun has ever actually used being Jewish for anything other than when people starting referring to him as the Hebrew Hammer for a short time last year. That didn’t really catch on.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Ok now I remember. There wasn’t much to the trailer, and I have given up on M Night movies. Funny People I was skeptical about because Adam Sandler, they showed a long trailer for that, looked like it could be good.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Ya…but the guys you’d chose would be terrible third basemen…much like Braun was his rookie year.
He is a chosen people technically.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Braun. I think his dad is Jewish, if his mom were Jewish it’d mayb e be a different story.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
gitc-the guys that get moved to 1b are the guys who suck at playing 3b or get too fat. i.e. Miguel Cabrera.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Trey-
A. He’s not a chosen people.
B. He may be a chosen person.
C. He’s not a Jew.
D. All of the above.
The answer is “D”.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
My wife’s mom isn’t Jewish…but she is
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
and wikipedia is always right…i was just going by what i’ve read from brewers people
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Sae-
It is his dad who’s Jewish. His dad fell victim to shiksappeal.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
okay. sorry for bringing up the jew thing. back to why longoria > braun, and why teams should be allowed to fail miserably.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Trey-
I don’t see anything about his mom being Jewish in his wiki.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I fixed that should be isn’t I dunno why I put was Jewish too.
Too much work.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
According to Jewish law, being Jewish is pretty much a biological state. You can’t convert out of it or do anything to lose it. You can only be Jewish if your mother was Jewish, or if you convert which is extremely rare as Jews don’t proselytize.
/back to why Longoria sucks
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I think Sarah Silverman is a hot Jew. Or just hot period.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
at least braun isn’t married to tony parker…
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Ill end it…true story while at UF David Eckstein was named to the College Jewish All-American Team.
He is Southern Baptist (I believe…definitly not Jewish though)
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Trey-
That story gets funnier every time.
Sae-
You don’t know that.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
When baseball has contractions, do you rush it to the hospital?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Trey-
What if they are those Braxton Hicks Contractions?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Oh Trey…I was waiting for someone to step in that one. Glad it was you.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I can’t stop laughing at this….I always think the same thing when I hear Longoria’s name in baseball discussions
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
building a new team from contracting those:
SP Greinke
SP Halladay
SP Gallardo
SP Millwood
SP Shields?
RP Frank Francisco
RP O’Day
RP Wuertz
RP Wheeler
1B Fielder
2B Aaron Hill
3B Longoria
SS Michael Young
LF Braun
RF Nelson Cruz
CF Crawford
C Bartlett
Bench Rolen
Bench Kurt Suzuki
contract the Twins to eliminate 7 teams, then combine to get back to even and you could add Mauer and Morneau
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Aaron Hill over Kinsler?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
…and I’d replace Millwood and Shields, with Garza and Price.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
can kinsler play left?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
price hasn’t done enough to warrant a spot on any rotation.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
threw it together quickly without looking at every number, hill can move to the bench, no problem with that
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
True…but if this is a draft scenario, I’m not taking him based on what he has done, I’m taking him on his potential.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
There’s going to be one hell of a battle at closer between Nathan and Soria who were both not mentioned but are a lot better than Fransisco.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Finally took a break from driving to D-Town… I can’t believe no one would take Halladay. Best SP in baseball, hands down. Braun/Longoria aren’t even bs their own position
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Big D, you know of a more talented 3B at the age of 23?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I think he’s the best, but the gap between him and whoever is in second (Johan, Lincecum, Beckett) is not “hands down” better.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Pitchers are less valuable than hitters anyway. Besides that, who is the mythical left fielder better than Ryan Braun? Ibanez might be having a better year so far but I doubt people think he’s better than Braun. Obviously Manny’s career is incredible, but I’m not sure he’s better right now.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Kinda hard to be better when you’re not playing.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
.
/fix’d
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
For the Holidays!
/Castanza’d
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
Atlanta is small market?
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
The crowds they draw are small market. Zing!
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I think the divisions would be better this way:
AL East: Red Sox, Yankees, Oriole, Nationals
AL Central: Tigers, White Sox, Twins, Indians
NL East: Braves, Mets, Phillies, Marlins
NL Central: Pirates, Reds, Cubs, Cardinals
The Western divisions would stay the same.
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0
I like the idea of realignment but we need to understand why they need to be realigned. The underperforming cities can support a franchise if they played against teams with like resources.
I think you need to add a 2 teams to make it 32 teams. Add 2 playoff spots so there is 12 of 32 who can make the playoffs and instead of restrict a players earnings realign teams based on payroll spent. example:
Yanks, Red Soxs, Mets, Phils in one division and Teams like the Pirates, Nationals, Indians, Reds in another. This would ensure teams with lower payrolls can be represented in the playoffs. As you spend more you change divisions. This would keep the schedule fresh and teams like the Pirates and Royals would have a chance to play in October.
check out the plan at:
http://thefairball.com/mlb-realignment-plan/
(Quote)
Hell Yeah! or Hell No!:
0 
0