Big D:

Whoops. Guess I should read the comments first…

I still have no idea who it is.

Big D: Whoops. Guess I should read the comments first…

if it said “was suspended for drugs”, you’d be on the right track.

spencer096:
you mean a HoF that let in paul fucking molitor and cal ripken?
no.not even close…the baseball hall of fame is even worse.

ha. go look at the list of guys in the hof for football. it’s pathetic when compared to baseball. i really wished you used jim rice as your example.

sparty: for the most part, but getting worse, baseball has done a very good job.

you mean a HoF that let in paul fucking molitor and cal ripken?

no. not even close…the baseball hall of fame is even worse.

for the most part, but getting worse, baseball has done a very good job.

sparty: i guess you think swan and stalworth don’t belong in the hall. oh, they made spectactular catches in the super bowl, that’s all that counts. guess it is time to put in mark ingram and david tyree.

hardly. swann doesn’t belong because his career numbers are pathetic. stallworth i have no problem with, but bradshaw i do.

the hall of fame is a total package…great production over a career AND memorable moments. there are some exceptions, but monk doesn’t fit that criteria.

and that’s not worthy of a gold jacket, i’m sorry. in your defense though, i advocate the smallest hall of fame possible. it makes me sick to my stomach that guys like jim kelly, troy aikman and emmitt smith are in there. it’s just retarded.

spencer096:
theissman, doug williams and mark rypien?not the best, but not terrible either.but what about their awesome OL and great running game?or the fact that there were two other extremely good WR’s on those same teams?that didn’t help monk out at all?

jay schroeder, don’t forget that gem. rypien had one good season. one!

i guess you think swan and stalworth don’t belong in the hall. oh, they made spectactular catches in the super bowl, that’s all that counts. guess it is time to put in mark ingram and david tyree.

sparty:
i never said anything of the sort.it all starts on the line.usually a qb makes a receiver a better player, right?can you please look at the garbage that played qb for the skins.

theissman, doug williams and mark rypien?

not the best, but not terrible either. but what about their awesome OL and great running game? or the fact that there were two other extremely good WR’s on those same teams? that didn’t help monk out at all?

sparty…he was the first WR to have grossly inflated numbers.

being the first and being one of the followers is completely different.

spencer096:

sparty…he was the first WR to have grossly inflated numbers. is tj houshmazilly one of the best WR’s today? hardly, but he gets a bunch of catches. is welkah? not even close, but he gets a bunch of catches.

having catches and yards means dick. any WR can get a bucnh of catches, not every WR can truly dictate how a game is played.

Ya they can’t all be Mark Duper and mark Clayton…SNUBBED

having catches and yards means dick. any WR can get a bucnh of catches, not every WR can truly dictate how a game is played.

GatorTrey:

Where the hell do you get that stuff? You were like a week old during that game.

my friend, Google, knows a lot of stuff. I just asked him.

/I was almost 3 years old, thank you very much.