<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case For Contraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/</link>
	<description>Where We Told You Evan Turner &#62; John Wall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mckillop</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-60514</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mckillop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-60514</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of realignment but we need to understand why they need to be realigned. The underperforming cities can support a franchise if they played against teams with like resources.

I think you need to add a 2 teams to make it 32 teams. Add 2 playoff spots so there is 12 of 32 who can make the playoffs and instead of restrict a players earnings realign teams based on payroll spent. example:

Yanks, Red Soxs, Mets, Phils in one division and Teams like the Pirates, Nationals, Indians, Reds in another. This would ensure teams with lower payrolls can be represented in the playoffs. As you spend more you change divisions. This would keep the schedule fresh and teams like the Pirates and Royals would have a chance to play in October. 

check out the plan at:

http://thefairball.com/mlb-realignment-plan/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of realignment but we need to understand why they need to be realigned. The underperforming cities can support a franchise if they played against teams with like resources.</p>
<p>I think you need to add a 2 teams to make it 32 teams. Add 2 playoff spots so there is 12 of 32 who can make the playoffs and instead of restrict a players earnings realign teams based on payroll spent. example:</p>
<p>Yanks, Red Soxs, Mets, Phils in one division and Teams like the Pirates, Nationals, Indians, Reds in another. This would ensure teams with lower payrolls can be represented in the playoffs. As you spend more you change divisions. This would keep the schedule fresh and teams like the Pirates and Royals would have a chance to play in October. </p>
<p>check out the plan at:</p>
<p><a href="http://thefairball.com/mlb-realignment-plan/" rel="nofollow">http://thefairball.com/mlb-realignment-plan/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tenjay</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-60282</link>
		<dc:creator>tenjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-60282</guid>
		<description>I think the divisions would be better this way:
AL East: Red Sox, Yankees, Oriole, Nationals
AL Central: Tigers, White Sox, Twins, Indians
NL East: Braves, Mets, Phillies, Marlins
NL Central: Pirates, Reds, Cubs, Cardinals
The Western divisions would stay the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the divisions would be better this way:<br />
AL East: Red Sox, Yankees, Oriole, Nationals<br />
AL Central: Tigers, White Sox, Twins, Indians<br />
NL East: Braves, Mets, Phillies, Marlins<br />
NL Central: Pirates, Reds, Cubs, Cardinals<br />
The Western divisions would stay the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knightwhosaysni</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58954</link>
		<dc:creator>knightwhosaysni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-58951&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-58951&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;patphish&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Atlanta is small market?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The crowds they draw are small market. Zing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-58951">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-58951" rel="nofollow">patphish</a></strong>: Atlanta is small market?
</p></blockquote>
<p>The crowds they draw are small market. Zing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patphish</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58951</link>
		<dc:creator>patphish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58951</guid>
		<description>Atlanta is small market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atlanta is small market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patphish</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58950</link>
		<dc:creator>patphish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58950</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-58595&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-58595&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
yeah, he only really uses it when it’s convenient

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For the Holidays!

/Castanza&#039;d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-58595">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-58595" rel="nofollow">sae</a></strong>:<br />
yeah, he only really uses it when it’s convenient</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For the Holidays!</p>
<p>/Castanza&#8217;d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knightro</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58768</link>
		<dc:creator>knightro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58768</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kinda hard to be better when you’re not &lt;del&gt;playing&lt;/del&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;juicing&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;.

/fix&#039;d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kinda hard to be better when you’re not <del>playing</del><strong><em>juicing</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>.</p>
<p>/fix&#8217;d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rekcalsa</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58763</link>
		<dc:creator>rekcalsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58763</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obviously Manny’s career is incredible, but I’m not sure he’s better right now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Kinda hard to be better when you&#039;re not playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obviously Manny’s career is incredible, but I’m not sure he’s better right now.</p></blockquote>
<p>Kinda hard to be better when you&#8217;re not playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guyinthecorner</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58760</link>
		<dc:creator>guyinthecorner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58760</guid>
		<description>Pitchers are less valuable than hitters anyway. Besides that, who is the mythical left fielder better than Ryan Braun? Ibanez might be having a better year so far but I doubt people think he&#039;s better than Braun. Obviously Manny&#039;s career is incredible, but I&#039;m not sure he&#039;s better right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitchers are less valuable than hitters anyway. Besides that, who is the mythical left fielder better than Ryan Braun? Ibanez might be having a better year so far but I doubt people think he&#8217;s better than Braun. Obviously Manny&#8217;s career is incredible, but I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;s better right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58663</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58663</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I can’t believe no one would take Halladay. Best SP in baseball, hands down.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think he&#039;s the best, but the gap between him and whoever is in second (Johan, Lincecum, Beckett) is not &quot;hands down&quot; better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I can’t believe no one would take Halladay. Best SP in baseball, hands down.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think he&#8217;s the best, but the gap between him and whoever is in second (Johan, Lincecum, Beckett) is not &#8220;hands down&#8221; better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparty</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58659</link>
		<dc:creator>sparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58659</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-58658&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-58658&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Big D&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Braun/Longoria aren’t even bs their own position

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Big D, you know of a more talented 3B at the age of 23?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-58658">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-58658" rel="nofollow">Big D</a></strong>: Braun/Longoria aren’t even bs their own position</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Big D, you know of a more talented 3B at the age of 23?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big D</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58658</link>
		<dc:creator>Big D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58658</guid>
		<description>Finally took a break from driving to D-Town... I can&#039;t believe no one would take Halladay.  Best SP in baseball, hands down.  Braun/Longoria aren&#039;t even bs their own position</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally took a break from driving to D-Town&#8230; I can&#8217;t believe no one would take Halladay.  Best SP in baseball, hands down.  Braun/Longoria aren&#8217;t even bs their own position</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guyinthecorner</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58639</link>
		<dc:creator>guyinthecorner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58639</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s going to be one hell of a battle at closer between Nathan and Soria who were both not mentioned but are a lot better than Fransisco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s going to be one hell of a battle at closer between Nathan and Soria who were both not mentioned but are a lot better than Fransisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58629</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58629</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-58626&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-58626&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sparty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: price hasn’t done enough to warrant a spot on any rotation.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

True...but if this is a draft scenario, I&#039;m not taking him based on what he has done, I&#039;m taking him on his potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-58626">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-58626" rel="nofollow">sparty</a></strong>: price hasn’t done enough to warrant a spot on any rotation.
</p></blockquote>
<p>True&#8230;but if this is a draft scenario, I&#8217;m not taking him based on what he has done, I&#8217;m taking him on his potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sae</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58627</link>
		<dc:creator>sae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58627</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-58623&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-58623&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;john&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Aaron Hill over Kinsler?

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

threw it together quickly without looking at every number, hill can move to the bench, no problem with that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-58623">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-58623" rel="nofollow">john</a></strong>: Aaron Hill over Kinsler?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>threw it together quickly without looking at every number, hill can move to the bench, no problem with that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparty</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58626</link>
		<dc:creator>sparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58626</guid>
		<description>price hasn&#039;t done enough to warrant a spot on any rotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>price hasn&#8217;t done enough to warrant a spot on any rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparty</title>
		<link>http://www.spartyandfriends.com/2009/06/24/the-case-for-contraction/comment-page-1/#comment-58625</link>
		<dc:creator>sparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spartyandfriends.com/?p=15915#comment-58625</guid>
		<description>can kinsler play left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can kinsler play left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
